IN-DEPTH RESEARCH ARTICLE • APRIL 2026
Iran. Israel. America.
The War That Is Changing Everything
A fully researched, fact-sourced article covering the origins of the conflict, what the world is saying, why America is really fighting, and how Pakistan is paying the price in petrol, food, and economic stability.
Contents 1. Background: How Did It All Begin? 2. Timeline: From 2024 to the 2026 War 3. What Each Country Is Saying 4. Why America Is Really Doing This 5. The Strait of Hormuz: The World’s Oil Tap 6. Impact on Pakistan: Petrol, Prices & People 7. Global Economic Impact (Data Tables) 8. What Experts and Analysts Are Saying 9. What Comes Next: Three Scenarios 10. Conclusion |
——— SECTION 1 ———
Background: How Did It All Begin?
The Iran-Israel-America conflict did not begin in 2026. It is the product of decades of hostility, proxy wars, nuclear anxiety, and geopolitical competition that finally boiled over into direct military confrontation. To understand what is happening today, you have to understand the roots.
Before 1979, Iran and Israel actually had good relations. Both were American allies. But when the Islamic Revolution overthrew the Shah and Ayatollah Khomeini came to power, Iran cut all ties with Israel and declared it an enemy of Islam. The new Iranian government called Israel an “occupying regime” and began supporting Palestinian militant groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.
For the next four decades, the two countries fought through proxy forces. Iran funded Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, the Houthis in Yemen, and various militias in Iraq and Syria. Israel responded with covert operations — assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists, bombing Iranian weapons convoys in Syria, and conducting cyberattacks on Iranian nuclear facilities.
The Nuclear Question
At the heart of everything is Iran’s nuclear program. Iran insists its nuclear activities are peaceful — for electricity generation. But by May 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran had enriched enough uranium to potentially build nine nuclear weapons.
Israel has long said it will never allow Iran to have a nuclear bomb. For Israel, an Iran with nuclear weapons is an existential threat. In June 2025, after diplomatic negotiations collapsed and the IAEA declared Iran non-compliant for the first time since 2005, Israel made its move.
Key Fact The IAEA reported in May 2025 that Iran had enriched enough uranium to theoretically produce 9 nuclear warheads. Iran denied any intent to build weapons. The US intelligence community's own Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, had testified in March 2025 that Iran was "not building a nuclear weapon." Yet by June 2025, war had begun. |
——— SECTION 2 ———
Timeline: From 2024 to the 2026 War
Understanding the sequence of events is critical. This did not happen overnight.
Date | Event | Significance |
April 2024 | First direct Iran–Israel missile exchange in 45 years | Israel struck Iranian consulate in Damascus; Iran retaliated with 300+ drones |
Oct 2024 | Second Iran–Israel exchange | Israel destroyed most of Iran’s S-300 air defense systems — a turning point |
June 13, 2025 | The 12-Day War begins | Israel launched 200+ jets, struck 100+ targets including Natanz nuclear facility |
June 21, 2025 | USA joins the 12-Day War | American bombers hit Fordow, Natanz, Esfahan — the most fortified nuclear sites |
June 24, 2025 | Ceasefire brokered by Trump | 12-Day War ends; 1,062 Iranians and 29 Israelis killed |
Dec 2025 – Jan 2026 | Mass protests inside Iran | Largest anti-government protests since 1979 revolution; thousands killed by security forces |
Feb 6, 2026 | US–Iran nuclear talks in Oman | Described as “constructive”; Iran had reportedly agreed to key demands |
Feb 27, 2026 | Peace was “within reach” | Oman FM said a breakthrough had been achieved; talks scheduled to continue |
Feb 28, 2026 | Operation Epic Fury launched | USA & Israel kill Supreme Leader Khamenei and dozens of senior Iranian officials |
Mar 4, 2026 | Iran closes Strait of Hormuz | 20% of world oil supply blocked; Brent crude surges past $100/barrel |
Mar 6, 2026 | Pakistan hikes petrol Rs.55/L | First emergency fuel hike; lines form at petrol stations across Pakistan |
Mar 8, 2026 | Brent crude hits $100+ | First time in four years; Goldman Sachs forecasts $110–126 range |
Apr 2, 2026 | Pakistan raises petrol to Rs.458/L | 42.7% hike; biggest single fuel price increase in Pakistan’s history |
Apr 3, 2026 | PM Sharif partially reverses hike | Petrol cut back to Rs.378/L after public outcry |
Apr 7, 2026 | US–Iran temporary ceasefire | Two-week ceasefire agreed; Strait of Hormuz situation still unresolved |
——— SECTION 3 ———
What Each Country Is Saying
This war has divided the world. Every major power has a position, and understanding those positions reveals the real game being played.
United States
Official position: The US claims it attacked Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons, to protect American forces and allies in the region, and to respond to Iranian aggression. Trump stated Operation Epic Fury was necessary to destroy Iran’s missile and nuclear capabilities.
What critics say: Legal experts, former officials, and even some Republican lawmakers say Trump launched an unconstitutional, preemptive war without Congressional approval. Crucially, on the very day before the strikes, Oman’s Foreign Minister confirmed Iran had agreed to a nuclear deal. Critics argue the war was launched despite — or because of — that diplomatic progress.
"This war is unconstitutional, unwise, and a betrayal of his promise to put the interests of the American people first." — Stimson Center analysts, March 2026
Israel
Official position: Israel says it had no choice. Iran was months away from a nuclear weapon. After decades of proxy attacks, assassinations of Israeli citizens, and funding of Hamas and Hezbollah, Israel says it acted in self-defense. Prime Minister Netanyahu called it a historic moment.
What critics say: Many international observers note that Israel’s own stockpile of 90–400 nuclear warheads is never subject to international inspection. The double standard — Israel can have nuclear weapons but Iran cannot — fuels deep resentment across the Muslim world and the Global South.
Iran
Official position: Iran calls the strikes an act of aggression and violation of international law. President Pezeshkian stated the war will only end with “recognition of Iran’s legitimate rights, payment of reparations, and firm international guarantees against future aggression.” Iran says it was attacked while actively engaged in peace negotiations.
Military reality: Despite losing Khamenei and many senior commanders, Iran has continued fighting using a pre-planned “decentralized mosaic defense” strategy. Its missile forces continued firing. A new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, was quickly appointed.
Other Key Countries
Country/Body | Position | Key Action |
Russia | Opposing the war; abstained at UN | Reportedly provided Iran with intelligence to help target US forces |
China | Opposing the war; abstained at UN | Mediation efforts; helped keep some oil flowing to China |
France / EU | Critical of the strikes; sought ceasefire | Macron led 15-nation initiative to reopen Strait of Hormuz |
Saudi Arabia | Officially neutral; quietly anxious | Missile strikes hit Saudi oil infrastructure; rerouting via Red Sea |
Pakistan | Neutral; urged diplomacy | Sent naval destroyers to escort tankers; declared 4-day work week |
Turkey | Critical of both Israel and US strikes | Expanded influence in Syria; negotiated with Iran for shipping passage |
UN / Guterres | Condemned US-Israeli strikes | Security Council resolutions passed; called for ceasefire |
India | Strengthened Israel ties; balanced Iran | Received US emergency oil waiver; Navy escorted tankers |
UK | Support for US/Israel position | Participated in UN resolutions; no direct military role |
——— SECTION 4 ———
Why Is America Really Doing This?
This is the question everyone is asking. The official reasons — nuclear weapons, regional security — are only part of the picture. Multiple analysts, leaked documents, and official statements point to a much deeper set of American interests.
Reason 1: The Nuclear Argument
The stated reason. Iran had enriched uranium to 60% — a level with no civilian justification. Israel warned a nuclear Iran would destabilize the entire region. The US agreed and acted. However, the IAEA itself stated there was no evidence of a structured nuclear weapons program when the 2026 war began. And negotiations in early 2026 were producing real results, making the timing of the attack deeply controversial.
Reason 2: Oil and Regional Dominance
Unofficial discussions during the 2026 Oman talks, cited by Al Jazeera’s Centre for Studies, revealed American interest in gaining influence over Iran’s oil and gas sector and rare mineral exploitation. Iran sits on the fourth-largest proven oil reserves and second-largest natural gas reserves in the world. A regime-change outcome friendly to Washington would be extraordinarily valuable for US energy interests.
"Unofficial discussions suggested American interest in gaining influence over Iran’s oil and gas sector and rare mineral exploitation." — Al Jazeera Centre for Studies, February 2026
Reason 3: Protecting Israel
The US-Israel alliance is the oldest and most consistent factor in American Middle East policy. Iran’s proxies — Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis — have spent decades attacking Israel. Eliminating Iran’s nuclear capability and weakening its government directly serves Israel’s security in a way that benefits the US-Israel relationship politically and strategically.
Reason 4: Domestic Politics and Midterm Elections
US analysts at Stimson Center noted that the war was launched in a midterm election year, and that Trump had previously achieved political wins by projecting strength (Venezuela policy). A quick, decisive military victory over Iran would have been enormously popular with Trump’s political base. Instead, the war has become prolonged and economically painful — raising gas prices that directly hurt American voters.
Reason 5: Regime Change
Both US and Israeli officials openly stated that regime change in Iran was a desired outcome. The strikes targeted not just nuclear sites but the entire leadership of the Iranian state. The assassination of Khamenei and dozens of senior officials was a direct attempt to decapitate the government. However, Iran’s military doctrine had prepared for exactly this scenario, and the regime survived.
The Bottom Line: What Does America Gain? Access to Iranian oil/gas if a new, friendly government comes to power Removal of the only remaining Middle Eastern state that directly defies US influence Elimination of Iran’s nuclear program to secure Israel’s regional military dominance Proof of US military credibility in the region after years of “strategic ambiguity” Control over the world’s most critical oil shipping corridor, the Strait of Hormuz Political capital for Trump’s domestic base heading into midterm elections |
——— SECTION 5 ———
The Strait of Hormuz: The World’s Oil Tap
No geographic location on Earth has more influence over the global economy right now than a narrow strip of water between Iran and Oman. The Strait of Hormuz is 54 kilometers wide at its narrowest point. But through it flows roughly 20% of the world’s entire oil supply — about 15–20 million barrels per day.
Iran closed the Strait on March 4, 2026, after Operation Epic Fury. The effects were immediate and catastrophic.
Statistic | Value | Source |
Oil passing through Hormuz daily | ~15–20 million barrels/day | Kpler / IEA, 2025 |
% of world seaborne crude oil | ~25–31% | EIA / Kpler |
LNG passing through daily | ~20% of global LNG | IEA |
Countries most exposed | China, India, Japan, S.Korea, Pakistan | CNBC / IEA |
Brent crude price before closure | $72–75 /barrel | Bloomberg, Feb 2026 |
Brent crude price at peak | $126 /barrel (Mar 2026) | Bloomberg |
Oil revenue lost by Gulf states per day | ~$1.1 billion | SolAbility analysis |
Global GDP impact (if closed 1 quarter) | -2.9% annualized global GDP | Dallas Fed Research, Mar 2026 |
Global GDP impact (worst case, 3 quarters) | -3.15% of world GDP (~−$3.5 trillion) | SolAbility / World Bank model |
Ships anchored waiting to transit | 2,000+ vessels | Reuters, Apr 2026 |
Tanker traffic drop | Over 90% decline by Mar 2026 | Britannica / Reuters |
Iran has reportedly laid sea mines in the strait. The IRGC issued warnings that any vessel attempting to transit could be targeted. By late March 2026, only ships from China, Russia, India, Iraq, and Pakistan were given permission by Iran to pass — a geopolitical signal that was unmistakable.
"The 2026 Hormuz closure is the largest supply disruption since the 1973 Arab oil embargo — with 15.8 million barrels per day stranded." — SolAbility Energy Analysis, March 2026
——— SECTION 6 ———
Impact on Pakistan: Petrol, Prices, and People
No country outside the Middle East has been hit harder by this war than Pakistan. The reasons are structural: Pakistan imports over 80% of its oil needs, Qatar is its primary LNG supplier, Kuwait is its main diesel supplier, and all of these shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz.
The Numbers: Pakistan’s Oil Dependency
Category | Data | Implication |
Pakistan’s oil import dependency | >80% of total oil needs imported | Extremely vulnerable to supply disruptions |
Total oil imports (Jul 2025–Feb 2026) | $10.71 billion | 30% of total import bill |
Every $1/barrel oil price rise | Adds $1.8–2 billion/year to import costs | Direct pressure on current account |
Strategic fuel reserves | ~28 days of consumption (at best) | Critically low; no buffer for extended crisis |
Primary LNG supplier | Qatar (ships via Strait of Hormuz) | Qatar declared force majeure in March 2026 |
Primary diesel supplier | Kuwait (ships via Strait of Hormuz) | Supply severely disrupted |
Pakistan’s freight rate increase | From $1,250 to $5,000 per container | Devastating for import-dependent industries |
The Petrol Price Shock: A Timeline
Date | Petrol Price (Rs/L) | Diesel Price (Rs/L) | Key Event |
Feb 2026 (before war) | ~Rs.225–240 | ~Rs.250 | Baseline: fragile but stable |
Mar 6, 2026 | Rs.321.17 | Rs.335.86 | Emergency hike: +Rs.55; first war impact hike |
Apr 2, 2026 | Rs.458.40 | Rs.520.35 | Largest hike in Pakistan history: +42.7% petrol, +54.9% diesel |
Apr 3, 2026 | Rs.378.00 | Rs.520.35 | PM Sharif reversed petrol hike partially after public outcry |
Cumulative rise (6 weeks) | +66% for petrol, +75% for diesel | — | Compared to pre-war baseline |
What This Means for Ordinary Pakistanis
Transport: Roughly 80% of petroleum products in Pakistan are used in transport. Bus fares, rickshaw rates, truck freight — all have climbed sharply. A delivery rider in Islamabad told Al Jazeera that fuel costs are eating into his savings and he can no longer afford to travel home for Eid.
Food prices: Diesel powers combine harvesters, threshers, and the trucks that move grain from fields to markets. As Pakistan’s wheat harvest began in April, food prices started climbing. Flour, rice, and vegetables are all being affected by rising transport costs.
Agriculture: Fertilizer prices are also rising. Roughly one-third of global fertilizer trade transits the Strait of Hormuz. New Orleans urea prices have already jumped from $475 to $680 per metric ton globally — a trend Pakistan’s farmers cannot escape.
Industry: Pakistan’s business community warned that 30-40% of raw material imports pass through the Strait. Shipping containers that cost $1,250 earlier were being quoted at $5,000. For textile exports and manufacturing, this threatens viability.
Government response: Prime Minister Sharif declared a four-day government work week, ordered 50% of staff to work from home, closed schools early, and told cricket fans to watch games from home to preserve fuel. The IMF, despite Pakistan’s pleas, resisted reducing petroleum levy requirements, keeping fiscal pressure at maximum.
Pakistan at a Glance: The Human Cost Petrol prices rose by 66% in six weeks — the largest increase in Pakistan’s history Diesel rose 75%, directly hitting agriculture, freight, and public transport Pakistan declared a 4-day work week for government employees to conserve fuel Pakistan sent naval destroyers to escort tankers in the Gulf of Oman The IMF refused to ease petroleum levy, deepening fiscal pressure Food inflation is projected to worsen as wheat harvest transportation costs rise Pakistan was specifically allowed transit by Iran due to diplomatic positioning |
——— SECTION 7 ———
Global Economic Impact: The Data
Country / Region | Impact | Severity |
Pakistan | 66% petrol hike, 4-day week, food inflation rising | Critical |
Bangladesh | 29% LPG hike, fuel pumps running dry, fuel rationing | Critical |
South Korea | Described as “hardest hit non-combatant” (CSIS, Apr 2026) | Severe |
Japan | Emergency oil reserves released; major LNG supply shock | Severe |
India | Dual shock: crude + LNG price spike; US emergency oil waiver granted | Severe |
China | Largest crude importer; some buffer from reserves, but exposed | Significant |
Australia | Hundreds of fuel station shortages reported | Significant |
Philippines | State of energy emergency declared Mar 24, 2026 | Severe |
Sri Lanka | Fuel rationing reintroduced; 4-day week for public sector | Severe |
Europe | LNG price spike; diesel shortages projected by April | Moderate-Severe |
USA | Gas prices rose to $4+/gallon; inflation outlook worsened | Moderate |
Gulf States | Oil infrastructure struck; $1.1 billion/day revenue lost | Severe |
Global GDP | -2.9% annualized growth projected (1-quarter closure) | Systemic |
——— SECTION 8 ———
What Experts and Analysts Are Saying
International Energy Agency (IEA) IEA head described the situation as the "greatest global energy security challenge in history." IEA released 400 million barrels from strategic reserves — an unprecedented move. IEA warned that a prolonged closure could force significant demand destruction globally. |
Goldman Sachs Raised Brent crude forecast to average $110 in March–April 2026. Estimated traders were demanding ~$14/barrel war-risk premium. Projected Brent could exceed $147 all-time record if Strait stays blocked 10+ weeks. Noted $580 million in suspicious oil futures bets placed 15 minutes before Trump announced a pause on strikes — sparking insider trading investigation. |
Dallas Federal Reserve Published analysis showing a one-quarter Hormuz closure raises WTI oil to $98/barrel. Projected -2.9% annualized global GDP contraction from a single-quarter closure. Concluded the closure removes “close to 20% of global oil supplies” from market. |
IMF (International Monetary Fund) Warned every 10% increase in energy prices over 2026 raises global inflation by ~0.5%. Said vulnerable economies like Pakistan face not just energy price pressure but supply chain disruption. Refused to reduce petroleum levy requirements for Pakistan despite the crisis. |
NPR / US Analysts on War Goals NPR analysis (April 8, 2026): "If the current deal endures, Trump’s justifications for the more than five-week conflict look largely unmet." Meaningful regime change, halting Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and dismantling its ballistic missile program are all "very much an open question." Analysts: the war has potentially produced a more hardline Iranian government, more determined to pursue nuclear weapons. "The war has taught Iran’s leadership a lesson about nuclear weapons: States that have them, like North Korea, are safe." — Ian Ralby, maritime security expert |
——— SECTION 9 ———
What Comes Next: Three Scenarios
Scenario | What Happens | Impact on Pakistan |
Scenario 1: Quick Ceasefire & Strait Reopens | US-Iran talks succeed. Ceasefire holds. Strait reopens in Q2 2026. Brent falls back to $80-90 range. | Partial price relief possible. Pakistan may reverse recent hikes partially. IMF deal continues. Economic recovery fragile but possible. |
Scenario 2: Prolonged War, Partial Hormuz Access | Ceasefire fails. Iran allows selective shipping. War drags on 6+ months. Brent stays $100-120. | Pakistan faces sustained high fuel costs. Agricultural season disrupted. Inflation above 25-30%. Social unrest likely. IMF programme under severe stress. |
Scenario 3: Escalation, Full Blockade Extended | War widens. Houthis block Red Sea. Hormuz stays closed 6+ months. Goldman Sachs $147+ scenario triggered. | Pakistan faces catastrophic fuel crisis. Petrol could hit Rs.600-700/L. Food insecurity. Industrial shutdown. Potential default risk. Social crisis. |
As of April 9, 2026, a temporary two-week ceasefire was agreed between the US and Iran. However, the ceasefire is already under stress: Israel continued strikes on Lebanon and there are reports of new attacks in the Strait of Hormuz. The IEA warned that Iran still controls whether ships can pass. A ceasefire that leaves Iran in effective control of the Strait is, in the words of one maritime expert, “a worse outcome than the status quo before the war.”
——— CONCLUSION ———
Conclusion
The Iran-Israel-America war is not just a distant Middle Eastern conflict. It is a tectonic geopolitical event that has exposed the fragility of global energy infrastructure, the limits of American military power, and the vulnerability of countries like Pakistan that have built their economies on imported energy flowing through a single geographic chokepoint.
For Pakistan, the stakes are existential. Petrol at Rs.458 per litre. Diesel at Rs.520. A 4-day work week. Naval destroyers sent to escort tankers. These are not policy abstractions — they are a delivery rider in Islamabad who can no longer afford to go home for Eid, a farmer in Punjab whose diesel costs have doubled at harvest time, and a factory owner in Karachi whose container freight costs have quadrupled overnight.
The real lesson of this war, for Pakistan and for every energy-dependent developing economy, is structural: strategic fuel reserves of 28 days are not enough. Dependence on a single shipping corridor through a war zone is not a policy — it is a vulnerability. And waiting for superpowers to negotiate peace while your economy burns is not a strategy.
"The 2026 Strait of Hormuz crisis is a conclusive tipping point for the energy security of Pakistan — not a provisional bother, but an existential warning." — Paradigm Shift / PIDE Research, March 2026
As for the war itself: the US’s stated goals — nuclear disarmament, regime change, missile dismantlement — are all unmet. Iran is battered but has not collapsed. A new Supreme Leader is in place. The Strait remains contested. And experts warn that if Iran now concludes that nuclear weapons are the only real protection against US aggression — as North Korea’s example suggests — then the war may have produced the exact opposite of its intended result.
The world is watching. And paying, at every petrol pump, every checkout counter, and every shipping terminal on Earth.
Key Sources Used in This Article Wikipedia: Twelve-Day War (2025) | 2026 Iran War | Economic Impact of 2026 Iran War | Strait of Hormuz Crisis 2026 Britannica: 12-Day War | 2026 Iran War | Israel-Iran Conflict Al Jazeera: Iran War Live Coverage | Global South Fuel Prices | Pakistan Austerity Measures Bloomberg: Iran War Hormuz Closure Oil Shock (April 2026) CNBC: Strait of Hormuz Closure Country Impacts (March 2026) Dallas Federal Reserve: Strait of Hormuz Closure Global GDP Impact (March 2026) SolAbility: Daily Cost of Strait of Hormuz Closure (March 2026) Stimson Center: Expert Reactions to Operation Epic Fury (Feb 28, 2026) NPR: What Has the US War With Iran Accomplished? (April 8, 2026) CSIS: Latest Analysis: War with Iran (April 2026) Dawn.com: Strait of Hormuz Poses Grave Risk to Pakistan Economy Paradigm Shift Pakistan: Price of Petrol & Strait of Hormuz Arab News: Pakistan Petrol Price Hike and Rollback (April 2026) France24 / AFP: Pakistan Raises Fuel Prices Due to Middle East War (April 2, 2026) The Friday Times: Pakistan’s Economy – Higher Inflation and Stagnation (April 2026) House of Commons Library: Iran – Impacts of June 2025 Israel and US Strikes Al Jazeera Centre for Studies: US and Iranian Calculations in New Negotiations (2026) Council on Foreign Relations (CFR): Global Conflict Tracker – Iran |
— End of Article —
